Editorial Follow Ups

•March 18, 2008 • Leave a Comment

This weekend’s editorial made some ripples in the NYC Blogsphere, lets take a look at my favorite response:

Reader Rant: ‘Commie Boards’ & Bow Ties Ruining City [Curbed.com]
Curbed posts an email rant (this does not reflect the opinions of the fine staff of curbed.com in any way) about how community boards are made up of old “commie” geezers who are above the age of 80, retired and only like wearing cruise-ship blazers and bow-ties. Besides having to resort to name calling, makes the argument that Community Boards are made up of a minority of people with nothing better to do than protect their communities and demand an equal voice in how their neighborhoods are being developed.

[Weekly Rant] Community Boards get more bite but also get the newspaper

•March 16, 2008 • Leave a Comment

The role of the Community Board has the topic of the week at the Blogter. In general, we here feel that Community Boards are the closest form of government for citizens and should get a lot more respect and attention than they currently receive. If you look at Brooklyn, the Community Boards have been vocal about concerns over the “gold rush” that is occurring there, but their voices often fall of deaf ears. The problem has always been that there was no real bite to their bark, but that may change if a new law is passed by the City Council.

197-a plans are a method for communities to formally establish development guides for city agencies that address the needs of the community. Creating a 197-a plan often requires a lengthy process of endorsements that has resulted in only ten plans being adopted since 1992 (when the law was enabled). Even when plans are passed, they cannot be enforced properly. An example was Columbia’s expansion being passed by City Council even though it directly violates the neighborhood’s 197-a. The new legislation that is being lobbied by The Community-Based Planning Task Force intends on changing the planning process to a bottom to top process.

However, the Bloomberg administration has created a road bump for seeing the effectiveness of bottom to top planning. A few months ago the city told Community Boards that they would be getting a $5,000 budget cuts. However, that was not the case, instead the city is now nearly tripling their budget cut to $16,000, or 8%, for Community Boards as part of its effort to tighten it’s belt. The problem with this is that the Community Board’s annual budget has always been $200,000 even during the good times. Cutting their budget is going to reduce the effectiveness of local government because Community Boards will now have to choose between operation costs and hiring experts for projects like 197-a plans.

Print media has also been raising concerns about the power of Community Boards. The New York Sun ran an article that questions the power Community Boards have by being able to reject liquor licenses to restaurants, even going far enough to insinuate that board members may be abusing their power for their own agendas.

What the Blogter is seeing is a struggle over the the philosophy of top to bottom vs. bottom to top governing in the works. The system we’ve seen, by example of the Atlantic Yards project, has been a series of city and developer decisions without any real input from the community. Now that is being threatened by recent legislature changes, so those benefiting from the current system are being threatened. Their answer to this is to weaken Community Boards even more, closing one door of citizens to get involved with their government.

If the budget changes are enacted, it is of the up-most importance that the local communities find volunteers to assist the boards so that we do not lose this opportunity to have real input into our neighborhoods futures. It is also the responsibility for Community Boards to also listen to its communities and adopt new ways of communicating and operating that reduces their spending.

Community Boards Gets Slashed

•March 14, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Community Boards are being hit by Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s budget cuts. The board’s budgets will be slashed by 8% or $16,000 from their annual $200,000. This may not seem like much, but it is a huge difference for the actual boards that have never received a raise even during good times. The budget reduction will force community boards to have to pick between hiring planning experts or basic operations of their offices. [more]

Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer has stated his opposition to the cuts.

The Campaign for Community-Based Planning has drafted a letter to Mark Page, Director of the NYC Office of Management and Budget. In this letter they call for Boards to be able to receive more funding to enable them to undertake effective planning processes.

This news comes after recent legislation has been looked at to increase the power of community boards in development

[Letter]

Here is the full petition.

Mark Page, Director
Office of Management and Budget
75 Park Place
New York, New York 10007

Dear Mr. Page:

We are writing to urge that you reconsider the proposed cuts to the city’s 59 community boards. The future ability of community boards to perform their charter-mandated responsibilities will be thrown into serious jeopardy if these cuts are allowed to go forward.

We are the Community-Based Planning Task Force—a coalition of community boards, citywide civic groups, grass roots neighborhood organizations, academics, and environmental justice activists that advocates for a more open, transparent, inclusive, and participatory planning process. Community boards are New Yorkers’ gateway to participation in the planning and development decisions that directly impact their neighborhoods, and we have consistently recommended increasing the boards’ resources so that they can plan more effectively for their districts.

The average community district has a population of over 130,000 people, making it comparable in size to Elizabeth, New Jersey and Albany, New York. All board responsibilities are carried out by a skeleton staff, and any extra personnel, such as planners, must be paid from funds raised beyond the board’s approximately $200,000 annual budget—which also pays for all salaries, office supplies, equipment, printing, and mailing. In comparison, Albany’s Division of Planning has an annual budget of $370,000 and employs six full-time staff. While the New York City Charter specifies that the boards are authorized to hire planners, it is the exception rather than the rule that they do so—they are forced to choose between planning expertise and basic operating costs.

The city is poised to add one million new residents; some districts have already grown by nearly 15 percent over the last census period. Community boards will be expected to make service delivery and planning decisions for this new surge of population—meaning additional siting of city facilities; more land use applications to consider; more variance applications to review; more people to inform and engage—critical work that keeps the city operating smoothly—with even less money. We urge that you enable the boards to perform their duties effectively—at the very least, by keeping their budgets intact.

Sincerely,

Eve Baron, Director
The Municipal Art Society Planning Center
On behalf of the Community-Based Planning Task Force

Cc:

Honorable Michael Bloomberg

Honorable Christine Quinn

Honorable Scott Stringer

Honorable Marty Markowitz

Honorable Adolfo Carrion, Jr.

Honorable Helen M. Marshall

Honorable James P. Molinaro

Ms. Nazli Parvizi, Commissioner, Mayor’s Community Assistance Unit

Balthazar owner to open new spot at Minetta Tavern

•March 13, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Keith McNally, owner of Balthazar and several other NYC restaurants, plans on opening a French restaurant where the Minetta Tavern (113 MacDougal St.) was located.  He announced this on Tuesday at a Community Board 2 meeting.  When asked about the clientel his establishment would attract, he said that they wouldn’t not be the limo crowd.

[more]

[In the press] Related, Bruno and Spring St.

•March 13, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Related Loves Republicans, Other Big Developers Lean Left [Observer]
The Related Companies, the guys working to rebuild Pier 40 into a new entertainment center, have been pumping money into the Republican Presidential candidates war chest while most other NYC developers donate dem. Senator Hillary Clinton leads in the amount of money received by a democrat.

Joe Bruno to Assume Powes of a Lt. Governor; Gets Key Vote in Albany [Daily News]
Now that Spitzer is gone and David Paterson is assuming the role as Governor, Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno will take over the post of Lt. Gov, giving him the power to vote twice in the instance of a tie (which is likely since the Senate is nearly split between democrats and republicans.)

Buyers Wait To Saddle Up Converted Stable in SoHo [NY Sun]
Two Florida developers have changed a 19th century stable and carriage house at 11 Spring St. into three high end apartments ($17.95 million for a triplex penthouse with a private elevator). The problem is that they aren’t selling… Oh, the building is owned by the Murdochs of News Corp fame.

Thats all for now.